Psycomedia Episode 20 – Delia’s Perfect Sweat
March 2, 2012 1 Comment
Yes, it’s actually got references this week! Ben is entirely responsible for that!
Landis, C. (1924). Studies of emotional reactions. I. ‘A preliminary study of facial expression.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7(5), 325 341. doi:10.1037/h0076072
Landis, C. (1924). Studies of emotional reactions. II. general behavior and facial expression. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(5), 447 510. doi:10.1037/h0073039
Muris, P., Huijding, J., Mayer, B., & de Vries, H. (2011). Does ‘yuck’ mean ‘eek’? fear responses in children after a disgust manipulation Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(2), 765-769. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.10.002
Rubin, D., Botanov, Y., Hajcak, G., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2011). Second-hand stress: Inhalation of stress sweat enhances neural response to neutral faces Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, doi:10.1093/scan/nsq097
Schaich Borg, J., Lieberman, D., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008). Infection, incest, and iniquity: Investigating the neural correlates of disgust and morality Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(9), 1529-1546. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20109
Hopkins, W. D., Russell, J. L., & Schaeffer, J. A. (2012). The neural and cognitive correlates of aimed throwing in chimpanzees: A magnetic resonance image and behavioural study on a unique form of social tool use Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1585), 37-47. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0195
A morphed face of Tim and Ben, aka a war crime:
If you need further convincing that Landis is an evil scientist:
The cuscus, pre-grinding:
The abstract of A Flux Capacitor for Moth Pheromones.
Olsson SB, Hansson BS.
In this issue of Chemical Senses, Baker et al. propose a provocative and intriguing explanation for a commonly observed phenomenon in moth chemocommunication. Sex pheromones in moths typically consist of mixtures of long-chain unsaturated compounds in specific ratios. These ratios are correspondingly detected by male moths using separate olfactory sensory neurons for each pheromone component housed singly or multiply in long trichoid sensilla on the antennal surface. These neurons are often present in different proportions, typically with the neuron responding to the highest ratio component present in greatest abundance or with the largest dendritic diameter. In their article, Baker et al. postulate that these physical differences in neuron magnitudes arise to compensate for the higher molecular flux present with the most abundant pheromone components. Such a suggestion raises several questions concerning the physiological and behavioral nature of pheromone communication. Specifically, is the flux in a natural pheromone plume high enough to warrant increased flux detection for the most abundant components? Second, how can changes in neuronal number or size lead to increased flux detection? And finally, how would this increased flux detection be accomplished at molecular, cellular, and ultimately network scales? We address each of these questions and propose future experiments